|
|
Post by zuricksaves on Jan 1, 2006 23:54:28 GMT
Lock my topic babay, you said it yourself, this board has freedom of speech, and therefore forcing me to act differently than what you expect out of everyone else, breaks your own law which you've been preaching about. That's a fact. They want to come in here and "score" a caw? Freedom of speech eh? I want to inform them this isn't about scoring, or perfection, then it's a crime eh? L O C K me up.  |
|
|
|
Post by xxxlonewolfxxx on Jan 2, 2006 0:15:57 GMT
ugh... Zurich enough with the cheap attempt to get heel heat. jeezey creezey... you dont have to respect me, the other members of the boards but god, follow the rules and if a mod says to do something (meaning follow rules or be nice) do it.
|
|
Numero Uno
Jobber
The Movelist and CAE GOD!
Posts: 82
|
Post by Numero Uno on Jan 2, 2006 5:29:31 GMT
Anyhoo, that CAW is as Bret Hart was called "The Excellence of Execution". I like how the tights have that little shine effect in them. That's cool right there. The logos even have good skill in them. So, if anyone wants to flame about that, I just don't care because it's that whole opinion thing. |
|
thaKEAF
Jobber
no idea's original
Posts: 148
|
Post by thaKEAF on Jan 2, 2006 19:02:23 GMT
That looks real good but I don't get why you think you're a God or something just cause you make CAWs.
|
|
|
|
Post by iwasaki on Jan 2, 2006 20:57:11 GMT
I think we can forgive STG and Zurick a little frustration. I've admittedly never posted a CAW, i might someday, but right now there isn't a huge market for the CAWS that i make. I can't imagine how lame it must be to sign on after posting your CAW only to find 10 or more posts with something like "UR CAW sux! -1/100! I like CAWGODZ way better!" or "Please post soon, what could you possibly be doing in life that you don't have the time to type a formula for us ingrates?"
Freedom of speech is one thing, but you've got to draw a line somewhere. Zurick may have been a bit proud of his CAW, but i hardly think anyone can blame him. What's further is that freedom of speech would indicate that Zurick was completely within his rights to defend himself from people that had more of a problem with him than his CAWs.
To single Zurick and STG for saying their piece, while defending everyone's right to their opinion seems a bit silly. I know a line has to be drawn somewhere, but i for one would like to see pointless posts being controlled first. The kind where someone posts. "UR caw rules/sux." or rates it with absolutely no support. Creative criticism is the name of the game. If you have no way to improve the caw, leave it be. Otherwise you're just filling a thread with hot air. That having been said. This is a pretty lengthy post isn't it?
I think the CAW is pretty accurate, and i'd like to see the form. I seem to remember AJ having a wider face, but the comparison picture would indicate otherwise. Great CAW.
|
|
|
|
Post by blackhooker on Jan 2, 2006 21:07:22 GMT
are you gonna post the formula?
|
|
|
|
Post by bloodyeyes on Jan 2, 2006 23:20:10 GMT
after this great and absolutely accurate post (below) I think we can forgive STG and Zurick a little frustration. I've admittedly never posted a CAW, i might someday, but right now there isn't a huge market for the CAWS that i make. I can't imagine how lame it must be to sign on after posting your CAW only to find 10 or more posts with something like "UR CAW sux! -1/100! I like CAWGODZ way better!" or "Please post soon, what could you possibly be doing in life that you don't have the time to type a formula for us ingrates?" Freedom of speech is one thing, but you've got to draw a line somewhere. Zurick may have been a bit proud of his CAW, but i hardly think anyone can blame him. What's further is that freedom of speech would indicate that Zurick was completely within his rights to defend himself from people that had more of a problem with him than his CAWs. To single Zurick and STG for saying their piece, while defending everyone's right to their opinion seems a bit silly. I know a line has to be drawn somewhere, but i for one would like to see pointless posts being controlled first. The kind where someone posts. "UR caw rules/sux." or rates it with absolutely no support. Creative criticism is the name of the game. If you have no way to improve the caw, leave it be. Otherwise you're just filling a thread with hot air. That having been said. This is a pretty lengthy post isn't it? I think the CAW is pretty accurate, and i'd like to see the form. I seem to remember AJ having a wider face, but the comparison picture would indicate otherwise. Great CAW. we get this imediate reply (below) are you gonna post the formula? my question is: are we in a lost world? |
|
|
|
Post by iwasaki on Jan 2, 2006 23:37:18 GMT
are you gonna post the formula? Thank you, ironically you've proved my point. (See previous post.) I don't want to be accused of violating anyone's freedom to their opinion, so i would point out that maybe this would better serve you in a PM to Zurick. This way it won't be lost in a flood of constructive criticism and you'll only have to type this once. My intention is not to hit Zurick, Wolfgang, STG or any of the other great CAW artists (my words NOT theirs) with a terrible amount of PMs, just to keep pointless posts off the board. While i have your attention, would it kill everyone to write full words or run spell check every once in a while? This way maybe you'll have the time to consider whether your posting is really worth reading. |
|
|
|
Post by ECW_Fan4Life on Jan 3, 2006 4:07:01 GMT
I for one would like the formula/hacks necessary to make this AJ Styles. And that's all I've gotta say about that.
|
|
|
|
Post by SharpShooting-Dogg223(WAL) on Jan 3, 2006 4:09:11 GMT
I hate caws with hacks with them i dont got any gameshark or whatever else there is i gotta get one.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxlonewolfxxx on Jan 3, 2006 14:01:34 GMT
i agree dogg.
|
|
|
|
Post by raven369 on Jan 3, 2006 19:15:04 GMT
I like this AJ Styles better in my opinion. It's by the same person that did the 4th AJ Styles on your comparison pic.   |
|
|
|
Post by DANZILLA on Jan 3, 2006 19:35:15 GMT
Raven369, this is by far better than Zuricks AJ. Whoever did it, great work.
|
|
STG
Up and Comer
Posts: 294
|
Post by STG on Jan 3, 2006 19:36:18 GMT
Raven369, this is by far better than Zuricks AJ. Whoever did it, great work. It's Moby1's. |
|
|
|
Post by lashley on Jan 3, 2006 19:52:06 GMT
were can i find the formula for the one you posted Raven369?
|
|
|
|
Post by raven369 on Jan 4, 2006 2:16:29 GMT
|
|
inf
Jobber
Posts: 15
|
Post by inf on Jan 4, 2006 2:32:59 GMT
Great caw Zurick, looking forward to the save.
|
|
moby1
Jobber
Man of 1000 mask
Posts: 90
|
Post by moby1 on Jan 4, 2006 2:49:02 GMT
|
|
xkillaz4x
Jobber
"I WILL NOT DIE"- Matt Hardy
Posts: 80
|
Post by xkillaz4x on Jan 4, 2006 2:55:08 GMT
10/10 perfect caw
|
|
|
|
Post by kennettrulz on Jan 4, 2006 2:57:34 GMT
That AJ Styles is awesome az!
|
|
